Reviewing my writing
Nearly all of my research is done. Before I charge into the practical chapters explaining the project this paper proposes, I am going back through and editing the 120 pages that precede it. It is a strange feeling to be able to read through all of this work in one sitting. There has been so much thought, so many issues percolating in my brain as I drift off to sleep and as I step into the shower in the morning, so many hours of reading and searching through sources, so many paragraphs that seemed to take a whole afternoon to nail down. It is strange to see it all in one relatively small contained piece.
Implications of sections worry me. Because I am arguing that we demonstrate our faith through community as an organic and interactive form of evidence for our faith, I worry it could be interpreted as pietistic, that I could appear to be creating an atmosphere that puts pressure on individuals in the community to live up to a standard of good works. Reading through the flow of the chapters alerts me to this and has left me dwelling all morning (as I made meals, got kids dressed and played candy land with them) on how I can emphasize the continuity of our focus on grace and God's loving acceptance of us.
This doesn't have a lot of impact on you, my readers. I just wanted to write a few words about what it is like to go through this dissertation process. It is a struggle because it is academically difficult and because it feels so vulnerable. I am taking a position and making an argument. It reflects on me. To the degree that people like or dislike it, agree or disagree with it, it reflects on me.
I am counting on my expectation that very few people are willing to read an academic paper like this. If the first 20 pages of the history, grounds and programmatic details of Calvin Crest don't make them put it down, perhaps the interaction with Lyotard in Chapter 2 will, or the somewhat tedious analysis of Jesus' use of the kingdom of God in Chapter 3.
And then, if I do not post it electronically, it will only exist in the few hands that get a hard copy, and in the bowels of the library at Fuller Theological Seminary. Perhaps a lack of access, too, will save me.
How many dissertations or DMin ministry focus papers have you or anyone else read? I have read a few, but primarily as examples for how to write my own. I expect to be protected from readers and critics just by how boring it is.
Implications of sections worry me. Because I am arguing that we demonstrate our faith through community as an organic and interactive form of evidence for our faith, I worry it could be interpreted as pietistic, that I could appear to be creating an atmosphere that puts pressure on individuals in the community to live up to a standard of good works. Reading through the flow of the chapters alerts me to this and has left me dwelling all morning (as I made meals, got kids dressed and played candy land with them) on how I can emphasize the continuity of our focus on grace and God's loving acceptance of us.
This doesn't have a lot of impact on you, my readers. I just wanted to write a few words about what it is like to go through this dissertation process. It is a struggle because it is academically difficult and because it feels so vulnerable. I am taking a position and making an argument. It reflects on me. To the degree that people like or dislike it, agree or disagree with it, it reflects on me.
I am counting on my expectation that very few people are willing to read an academic paper like this. If the first 20 pages of the history, grounds and programmatic details of Calvin Crest don't make them put it down, perhaps the interaction with Lyotard in Chapter 2 will, or the somewhat tedious analysis of Jesus' use of the kingdom of God in Chapter 3.
And then, if I do not post it electronically, it will only exist in the few hands that get a hard copy, and in the bowels of the library at Fuller Theological Seminary. Perhaps a lack of access, too, will save me.
How many dissertations or DMin ministry focus papers have you or anyone else read? I have read a few, but primarily as examples for how to write my own. I expect to be protected from readers and critics just by how boring it is.
